Not Since Art Garfunkel Decided He Didn’t Need Paul Simon
New Line Cinema, the studio that brought us the classic Dumb and Dumber and then decided years later to make a prequel, Dumb and Dumberer without any of the original talent has done it again. In fact, they have topped themselves. The studio who brought us my favorite films of all time, Peter Jackson’s vision of The Lord of the Rings, has decided that they do not need Jackson or his creative team to make The Hobbit or another prequel that was in the works, though I’m not sure on what text the other prequel would be based. Peter Jackson and Fran Walsh detail their side of the story in an open letter to their fans over at TheOneRing.Net. The following quotation sums up the looming debacle. “However last week, Mark Ordesky called Ken [Kamins (Jackson and Walsh’s manager)] and told him that New Line would no longer be requiring our services on the Hobbit and the LOTR ‘prequel’. This was a courtesy call to let us know that the studio was now actively looking to hire another filmmaker for both projects.”
Talk about hubris on New Line’s part. The Lord of the Rings films worked in large part due to the great source material J. R. R. Tolkien provided, but the adaptation to the screen could have failed miserably in the wrong hands. Jackson and his team made the right choices and have a proven track record with the material—$2.92 billion in box office receipts and 17 Academy Awards (according to the Wikipedia entry). Who is to say that the next team will do half as well?
For what it’s worth, I think that The Hobbit would make a great HBO series like From the Earth to the Moon or Band of Brothers. The Hobbit has an episodic structure and each chapter is basically its own self-contained adventure. It would make for a series of great one-hour episodes.


David Lee Roth, Andrew Ridgeley, and David Caruso also come to mind, but I think you said it best yesterday when you said that it is like Disney making Toy Story 3 without Pixar. Stupid…truly, truly stupid.
Comment by Timbo — November 24, 2006 @ 8:02 am
It is hard to imagine that this is something other than the inflated ego of someone at New Line pushing his career and his company off a cliff.
Comment by Bill Ekhardt — November 25, 2006 @ 2:06 pm
Tyler, I read somewhere (but now have lost the link) that the distributing company doesn’t like what New Line is doing and actually are working to bring Jackson back into the mix…
Comment by Eddy E — November 25, 2006 @ 5:09 pm
Eddy, it looks like you may be right on this. (See this post.) Keeping my fingers crossed.
Comment by Tyler Watson — November 26, 2006 @ 2:51 pm
I thought they passed some kind of law against this.
Comment by Matt — November 27, 2006 @ 5:53 pm
Well, the open letter does point out that there is an ongoing lawsuit between Jackson and New Line over the accounting on previous films. From a business standpoint it makes sense for New Line to cut ties with Jackson. From a creative and artistic standpoint it is likely a bad move.
Comment by Samer Farhat — November 28, 2006 @ 4:06 pm
Simon and Garfunkel? You’re 25 going on 50 :^)
Comment by Tom Pratt — November 30, 2006 @ 12:00 am