Comments on: Not Since Art Garfunkel Decided He Didn’t Need Paul Simon

by: Tom Pratt

Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:00:21 +0000

Simon and Garfunkel? You’re 25 going on 50 :^)

by: Samer Farhat

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:06:31 +0000

Well, the open letter does point out that there is an ongoing lawsuit between Jackson and New Line over the accounting on previous films. From a business standpoint it makes sense for New Line to cut ties with Jackson. From a creative and artistic standpoint it is likely a bad move.

by: Matt

Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:53:36 +0000

I thought they passed some kind of law against this.

by: Tyler Watson

Sun, 26 Nov 2006 14:51:37 +0000

Eddy, it looks like you may be right on this. (See this post.) Keeping my fingers crossed.

by: Eddy E

Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:09:25 +0000

Tyler, I read somewhere (but now have lost the link) that the distributing company doesn’t like what New Line is doing and actually are working to bring Jackson back into the mix…

by: Bill Ekhardt

Sat, 25 Nov 2006 14:06:09 +0000

It is hard to imagine that this is something other than the inflated ego of someone at New Line pushing his career and his company off a cliff.

by: Timbo

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:02:54 +0000

David Lee Roth, Andrew Ridgeley, and David Caruso also come to mind, but I think you said it best yesterday when you said that it is like Disney making Toy Story 3 without Pixar. Stupid…truly, truly stupid.