“How can a train be lost? It’s on rails.”
—Jack, The Darjeeling Limited
Carey and I recently saw Wes Anderson’s latest work of brilliance, The Darjeeling Limited (I have a giant soft spot for Anderson’s films). The movie is about three estranged brothers going on a spiritual quest in India a year after their father’s death. I could say much more about the film’s merits, but for now I am thankful for its wonderful timeliness in coming into my life. This is a film I could feel writing itself onto my soul and bones and I could hear God speaking to me in my grief.
In my previous reflection on my dad I mentioned that I wished my culture had a set and more communal mode of grieving. The Darjeeling Limited highlighted that gap in my culture. In the film, the three brothers encounter another death in India and stay within the community through the initial mourning and funeral processes. We see women mourning together. We see the family prepare the body of the deceased for the funeral. The deceased’s family actively participates in the funeral and lights the pyre. The community surrounds the family and gives them space. All this in a culture where Hinduism is the dominant religion—a religion whose goal it is to leave the material world behind. It is a remarkable and moving sequence of filmmaking.
Dad died at 3:16am on September 12. Carey and I raced up to Clovis a few hours later as we were in no condition to drive immediately after the death. There was some doubt as to whether we would be able to see Dad prior to cremation—in a matter of hours, a Byzantine bureaucracy grew, involving the hospital, the county coroner’s office, and the burial society my parents had hired. I frantically called these agencies trying to arrange a viewing for Carey and I. The person I spoke with at the hospital told me that my father was still at the hospital, but I couldn’t see him. “You wouldn’t want to see him like this,” the woman said. That infuriated me. How dare she tell me what I wanted at that moment. I wanted to see my father, period. No matter what state he was in. He had endured several procedures, so I understood that he would have looked bizarre from all the needle pokes and tubes placed in him, but I would have wanted to see him had he been maimed, because having that moment of physical connection would have been better than the void. We were finally able to see Dad days later by setting up a viewing with the burial society for two hundred bucks. They wheeled him out with a sheet tucked underneath his chin. After a few meaningful minutes with him, we left, and the funeral home workers wheeled him back out for further storage and eventual cremation. All this in a culture where Christianity—with its robust views of God calling the human (body and all) “very good” and the bodily resurrection—is supposed to be the dominant religion.
What has happened? Why isn’t the family more involved in the touch and presence of our loved ones’ bodies? Why were we not present at the cremation, which instead of being done in the messy presence of the community, is shopped out to some sanitized business who takes care of that detail for the bereaved? I fear it is because, as Harold Bloom has observed, Gnosticism, with its pseudo-Christianity and hatred of the body and all things material, is the “real” religion of the United States. We deny and fear death in this culture. We work hard to avoid it, we separate ourselves from getting our hands dirty in death and suffering so that we feel we must avoid any reminder. We don’t know how to die well because we don’t want to even acknowledge death’s existence.
Since we don’t know how to die well, those of us who remain after a death, don’t know how to mourn or be with people mourning—of course, Job’s friends didn’t know how to be with him either. If someone violently wails, some may say that he isn’t handling the death well. On the other hand, if someone shows little to no emotion, she is being strong. Mine is a culture that has retarded itself when it comes to mourning. Sure, we have funerals or memorial services, wakes and viewings, and the wonderful generosity of cooked meals and flowers. But we have undercut our ability to truly deal with death or mourning. The commodification of death and mourning seems to be a culprit, though I don’t intend to condemn funeral homes, undertakers, or greeting cards, even if I am concerned about some of the messages and assumptions conveyed.
Anderson’s film reminds us that mourning cannot be prescribed. Psychologists have accurately outlined the five stages of grief (denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance), but the order and duration in which the mourner experiences them can seem random at best. When Dad died, I think I felt all five stages within a span of minutes. Some days and weeks now are spent in one of the stages. The characters of The Darjeeling Limited realize that following an itinerary of grief and spiritual awakening is a quixotic venture. They also learn that the frameworks other cultures set up for grief act as helpful guides through mourning. A dear friend of ours gave us the first in a series of booklets, Journeying through Grief written by Kenneth C. Haugk and published by Stephen Ministries. A Time to Grieve has been helpful for Carey and I in its short messages to the reader. It doesn’t tell you what to feel, but validates your emotions and experiences. It gives you space and helps you breathe. It doesn’t say any type of mourning is good or bad; it simply states that mourning is normal, natural, and necessary. I’m thankful for a resource like this, but am saddened that in my culture, the emotions of grief have to be affirmed. It is strange to think that someone needs to stand against the tide and say that grief is natural.